South Carolina Supreme Court Blocks Legislative Pay Raise Amid Controversy
COLUMBIA, S.C. — In a significant legal decision, the Supreme Court of South Carolina has granted a preliminary injunction to obstruct the implementation of a controversial pay increase for state legislators. This development follows a lawsuit initiated by State Senator Wes Climer, who claims that the General Assembly’s actions effectively resulted in an unauthorized $18,000 annual raise.
The court’s order mandates State Treasurer Curtis Loftis to "cease and desist from distributing any funds" allocated under the Proviso of the 2025-2026 Appropriations Act until further notice. The contentious change included a hike in "in-district compensation" from $1,000 to $2,500 per month, impacting all 46 senators and 124 House members scheduled to receive the raise starting July 1, at the onset of the new fiscal year.
Senator Climer, a Republican representing Rock Hill, argues that this increase contravenes the state constitution, which prohibits lawmakers from augmenting their per diem during their current term. He further contends that the raise should have been introduced as a standalone bill rather than incorporated discreetly into the budget process late in the legislative session.
This unfolding situation has sparked debate on legislative ethics and budgetary transparency, as constituents and political observers watch closely. Climer’s legal challenge raises critical questions about accountability and the mechanisms through which lawmakers manage their compensation. The injunction will remain in effect while the lawsuit is pursued, ensuring that the status quo remains until the court reaches a final determination on the matter.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
